From the very earliest days of Benghazi, I have been one of the people CONSTANTLY asking the question the media has almost completely ignored: WHAT ABOUT THE 400 MISSILES THAT WERE “STOLEN” FROM THE EMBASSY? What were MISSILES doing at our EMBASSY anyway? That’s a rhetorical question by the way. In a post back in June titled: HILLARY CLINTON SUPPLIED STINGER MISSILES THAT TALIBAN USED TO ATTACK A U.S. CHOPPER, I said the following:
LOOKY THERE! THE GIFTS THAT JUST KEEP ON GIVING!
SHE'S NO LONGER SECRETARY BUT…
STILL WREAKING HAVOC!
When Benghazi first broke, I beat the story of the 400 Stinger Missiles to DEATH that were mysteriously in our embassy in Benghai. I'll have to check when I put the link below, I think the link has been shared like 10,000 times. That is how much I was pissing and moaning about them.
WHAT WERE MISSILES DOING AT OUR EMBASSY?
Allen West has gotten some intel from someone who was on the ground there, but regardless of the answer, whatever we were doing was bad news. Either the 400 Stinger Missiles were being smuggled through our Embassy which would make whoever authorized that (Cough Hillary, Cough, Obama) an accessory of some kind because above board organizations would NOT need to be SMUGGLING Missiles.
Worse, maybe we were selling them to someone? If you go all the way back to the first or second day I mentioned them (which was right after the attacks), I kept saying over and over THOSE would be what one day brought Obama to justice. Well, one of those Stingers just took out an American helicopter.
How many were on board? Add those to Hillary and O’Bummer’s murder lists? How many are still out there? I must have said no less than 75 times I cannot believe there has not been one question on the Congressional panel yet, nor has the media covered it once… which I expect. The good news: Allen West confirmed the story from a source on the ground on 9/11/12.
I believe the issue of the missiles will be the final nails. For more:
- 400 U.S. MISSILES STOLEN IN BENGHAZI. HILLARY, CARE TO EXPLAIN?
- Latest Benghazi Revelations About 400 Missing Missiles
From my earliest posts on the scandal I believe when it’s all said and done… Justice WILL be served and Obama WILL pay for his crimes. How long that takes? I’ve never ventured a guess. I will say this, I am VERY encouraged by what Trey Gowdy has to say in the video below.
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter – have to go to Blog]
Western Journalism is reporting on a recent appearance by Trey Gowdy on Fox News’ The Kelly File with Megyn Kelly, in which Gowdy discussed future plans for the Benghazi Committee.
Gowdy told Kelly that he intends to call some of the witnesses to the Benghazi terrorist attack to testify. These are witnesses that heretofore have remained silent about what they saw and what they know.
“We have a very robust investigative plan that will kick off in December, and Megyn I can tell you my goal was to have an investigation where witnesses who have never been talked to before felt comfortable coming forward because of the seriousness of our investigation and that is precisely what is happening. So, it is not with a lot of fanfare and there aren’t a lot of public hearings, but trust me when I tell you we are making tremendous progress.”
Hillary Clinton should be very afraid. Gowdy has already proven that Hillary bears some guilt for what happened at Benghazi, and these upcoming hearings should only add confirmation of her guilt.
When Trey Gowdy eventually subpoenas Hillary, and compels her to testify, all of her future plans related to winning the Presidency will be in jeopardy, because she will be shown for the guilty and treasonous person she is, one who created an untenable situation for political purposes that led to the deaths of four Americans.
In a post back in August titled: ALLEN WEST COMES FORWARD WITH THE TRUTH ABOUT BENGHAZI, I said the following:
For two years, the American people have demanded to know the truth surrounding the events of September 11, 2012, in Benghazi, Libya. That was the night that four Americans were killed in terrorist attacks against a U.S. diplomatic mission and nearby CIA annex, attacks that were initially blamed on an anti-Islam video by an Obama administration in full campaign mode.
Democrats have completely stonewalled attempts to uncover the truth surrounding those attacks. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has insisted that Republican inquiries were a “diversion.” Hillary Clinton said there was “no reason” for the House to investigate them. Even President Barack Obama himself said that the issue was “not serious.”
Now former Florida Congressman Allen West says that the attacks may have derived ultimately from a clandestine CIA mission known as Operation Zero Footprint.
West provides numerous details about the mission on his website, naming those involved and aware of the operation, including politicians on both sides of the aisle.
The explanation is long and complex, and West advises readers to plan on taking at least 20 minutes to read through and digest the material he presents.
FROM ALLEN WEST’S WEBSITE:
The following was sent to me and in turn I will do my civic duty and widen its reach.
It is very detailed research and I will leave it to you to draw your own conclusion. But I will tell you this, it reads better than any spy thriller Hollywood could cook up. You will be amazed at the tangled web.
But here’s a spoiler that will be revealed if you read the full report: If Operation Zero Footprint in Libya was stupid, arming the Syrian branches of al-Qaida two years after the Syrian FSA was thoroughly corrupted by al-Qaida, is infinite degrees beyond stupid.
Read this at your leisure, but give it least 20 minutes to carefully comprehend what is written and piece it all together.
I am truly honored this group would entrust me to share it with you all. You may see the original text here, with all the source links intact from the Conservative Tree House, or you can read the story of Operation Zero Footprint below:
We now have a pretty good understanding of who, what, where, and why surrounding the 9/11/12 attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi Libya. We are also better positioned to understand why, or perhaps more importantly why not, certain actions were taken before, during, and in the immediate aftermath of the attack itself.
We know from the Bret Baier interview with Hillary Clinton that she was physically located at her 7th floor office in Washington DC on the night of the attack.
Unfortunately we also know during the November 2012 Thanksgiving holiday a mysterious fire took place in that building. Well, actually directly above her exact office – cause undetermined.
A “fire” which preceded an unfortunate slip and fall for the Secretary, resulting in a concussion, which led to the discovery of a blood clot, that ultimately delayed her congressional testimony before a Senate Hearing into the events of the night in question.
We know the Libyan uprising began on February 10th of 2011, and we also know that sometime around the end of February 2011 President Obama signed a presidential directive authorizing the State Dept and CIA to begin a covert operation to arm the Libyan “rebels”.
We know the “rebels” were positioned in two strategic places. Benghazi, and the port city of Darnah, both located in Eastern Libya.
We know this covert operation came to be known as “Operation Zero Footprint“, and fell under the military command authority of NATO not (important to repeat), NOT, the U.S. Military.
We know by the time operation “Zero Footprint” began, AFRICOM commander General Carter Ham was removed from OPSEC oversight in the Libyan campaign and NATO commander Admiral James G. Stavridis was in charge.
Stavridis was the Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) at the time of the Libyan uprising. He retired as SACEUR in 2013.
In 2011, 57-year-old Stavridis was the perfect pick for NATO Libyan intervention considering he is the son of Turkish immigrants. Turkey played a key role in what might be the most politically dangerous aspect of the events to the White House once the goals changed to redirection of the weapons from Operation Zero Footprint.
We know Operation Zero Footprint was the covert transfer of weapons from the U.S to the Libyan “rebels”. We also know the operation avoided the concerns with congressional funding, and potential for public scrutiny, through financing by the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
We also know that officials within the government of Qatar served as the intermediaries for the actual transfer of the weapons, thereby removing the footprint of the U.S. intervention.
We know the entire operation was coordinated and controlled by the State Department and CIA. We also know (from the Senate Foreign Relations Benghazi hearings) that “Zero Footprint” was unknown to the 2011 Pentagon and/or DoD commanders who would have been tasked with any military response to the 9/11/12 attack – namely AFRICOM General Carter Ham.
However, it would be implausible to think that then Defense Secretary Bob Gates or Joint Chiefs Chair Admiral McMullen were completely unaware of the operation, this aspect remains murky.
Both Secretary Gates and Joint Chiefs Chair McMullen were in place when Operation Zero Footprint began but retired from their jobs in Sept of 2011, and were replaced by Chuck Hagel and Martin Dempsey respectively.
Leon Panetta was CIA Director at the beginning of Operation Zero Footprint (March 2011) and was replaced by CIA Director David Petraeus in the fall of 2011 as Panetta replaced Bob Gates and became Secretary of Defense.
However, Panetta (now as Def Sec) and JC Martin Dempsey were the two who initially briefed President Obama on the night of Sept 11th 2012. Leon Panetta definitely had knowledge of the intents of the joint State Dept/Cia mission in Benghazi, Dempsey may not have.
We know the White House appears to have followed “The Intelligence Oversight Act of 1980” in informing the congressional “Gang of Eight” of Zero Footprint.
The Gang of Eight in 2011 would have included: Speaker – John Boehner, Minority Leader – Nancy Pelosi; House Permanent Select Committee on Intel Chairman – Mike Rogers, and his Democrat counterpart Charles Ruppersberger; Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid; along with Senate Intel Chair Diane Feinstein and her Republican counterpart, Saxby Chambliss.
From Hillary interviews we also know the White House liaison for Secretary Clinton and CIA Director Leon Panetta during Operation Zero Footprint was National Security Advisor To the President, Tom Donilon.
With this information we can assemble a cast of people “IN THE KNOW” of Operation Zero Footprint on two specific date blocks. March 2011 through Pre 9/11/12 attack – and – Post 9/11/12 attack forward.
March 2011 through Pre 9/11/12 attack: Who knew of Operation “Zero Footprint?”
- President Obama and Vice President Biden (both Dems)
- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (Dem)
- CIA Director Leon Panetta (March 2011 – June 2011)
- *CIA Director General David Petraeus (?) (Sept 2011 – Nov 2012)
- NATO Commander, James G Stavridis
- White House National Security Advisor Tom Donilon (Dem)
- Speaker of the House John Boehner (Rep)
- Minority Leader – Nancy Pelosi (Dem)
- House Permanent Select Committee on Intel Chairman – Mike Rogers (Rep)
- Minority House Intel Committee – Charles Ruppersberger (Dem)
- Senate Minority Leader – Mitch McConnell (Rep)
- Senate Majority Leader – Harry Reid (Dem)
- Senate Intel Chair – Diane Feinstein (Dem)
- Minority Senate Intel Committee – Saxby Chambliss (Rep)
- [State Dept] U.S. Libyan Ambassador – Chris Stevens
- [State Dept] U.S. Asst Secretary of State – Andrew Shapiro
- [State Dept] Senior Head of U.S. Weapons Office – Mark Adams
- Along with whomever inside each nation’s state government that was involved in either the finance (UAE), or the logistics (Qatar).
Obviously the “know” crowd would include the ultimate end destination users, “The Libyan Rebel Commanders”:
- Rebel Leader (Islamic Fighting Group) Abu Sufian Ibriham Ahmed Hamuda Bin Qumu – Darnah Brigade – Ansar Al Sharia
- Rebel Leader (Islamic Fighting Group) Abu Khattala – Commander of an Islamist militia group called the Abu Obaida bin Jarrah Brigade (17th Feb Brigade) Benghazi – Ansar Al Sharia
*NOTE* Both of these individuals were labeled as officially recognized State Dept. terrorists in December of 2013. Khattala recently having been arrested.
In addition, the “political face” of the Libyan Transitional Government Justice MinisterMustafa Abdel Jalil, should also be included in this list of people who knew of operation Zero Footprint while it was underway.
Justice Abdel Jalil served as the international face of, and spokesperson for, “the rebels” in 2011/12. He worked closely with Chris Stevens and highly visibly with Secretary Hillary Clinton – However, in my opinion – after extensive research- Jalil was a total patsy. He was paid well to present a comfortable face of the movement, but once Gaddaffi was killed Jalil was quickly dispatched.
This Brings us to who knew about “Operation Zero Footprint” post Benghazi 9/11/12 attack:
To which you can easily add:
- CIA Director General David Petraeus
- Adjunct, and Interim, CIA Director – Mike Morrel
- U.S. Attorney General – Eric Holder
- President Obama Advisor and now Chief of Staff – Denis McDonough
- President Obama Advisor and now Treasury Sec – Jack Lew
- President Obama Advisor and now National Security Advisor – Tony
- Former UN Ambassador and now Senior Nat Sec Advisor – Susan Rice
- Chief White House Communications Director – Ben Rhodes
Focusing on the post 9/11/12 team for a moment:
PART II – We know McDonough and Donilon were in the immediate loop on the night of 9/11/12 because they were photographed updating President Obama at 7:30pm in the Oval Office along with a curious Jack Lew who was Chief of Staff at the time.
In addition we know from former White House National Security spokesperson Tommy “dude” Vietor, that President Obama was not in the situation room where Vietor and his boss Tom Donilon were keeping up on events.
Here’s where it gets interesting:
Leon Panetta was the CIA Director when Operation Zero Footprint was authorized and began, but he left the CIA about 4 months later (June 30th, 2011) and was replaced by General David Petraeus (August/Sept 2011).
Under this principle you can see that General Petraeus had ZERO liability for the origin of the Benghazi weapons deals – it was a joint State Dept/CIA program already being conducted when Petraeus arrived. If it blew up, it was not his political problem.
We know that during the summer of 2012 “a whistleblower” popped up and gave House Republican Leader Eric Cantor a tip about CIA Director General Petraeus being in an extramarital affair with a reporter named Paula Broadwell; along with rumors Petraeus may have shared classified information with Broadwell during pillow talk etc.
We also know that Eric Cantor told AG Eric Holder and FBI director Robert Mueller about the claim and Mueller began an investigation of Petraeus in the Summer of 2012 before the Benghazi attack in September.
However, we also know that neither Holder nor Mueller (nor Cantor) informed anyone in congress this investigation of Petraeus was taking place. That investigation included Broadwell turning over her computer to the FBI in the same summer, and later a search of her home which did reveal confidential information supposedly leaked from Petraeus.
Sometime in October of 2012 Director of National Intelligence James Clapper had a conversation with Petraeus urging him to leave.
Immediately after the election of 2012 CIA Director David Petraeus resigned (Nov 9th) and interim CIA Director Mike Morrel took over. This is why Petraeus never testified to the Senate, and Morrel took his place.
We also know this timely switch was beneficial to both the Clinton and Obama camps because Morrel was more politically connected to them than Petraeus.
Given the risks of exposure to both “Operation Zero Footprint”, and worse, the buy-back/redirection to Syria, it’s understandable the risk to Clinton that Petraeus carried. However, Petraeus was not of any risk himself; maybe Leon Panetta would be, but not Petraeus – who, it’s important to add, came from the Defense Department to the office of CIA.
Petraeus’s replacement, interim CIA Director Mike Morrel, and White House Communications Director Ben Rhodes, were the two men who constructed the infamous “Susan Rice” talking points.
After Morrel testified to congress about the CIA involvement around Benghazi, and the issues of terrorism vs. Islamic movie (happy squirrel chase) etc. Morrel was replaced at the CIA by John Brennan.
We know that both Hillary Clinton and CBS immediately hired Mike Morrel. CBS News President David Rhodes -who hired Morrel- is the brother of the White House’s Ben Rhodes; who Morrel coordinated the Clinton friendly, albeit controversial, talking points with.
While it may seem suspect to jump to conclusions, the fact that Eric Holder did not inform either Intelligence Committee of the FBI Petraeus investigation -which is generally standard procedure- lends plausible suspicion to an outline that the events were used as leverage to remove Petraeus; and all of the subsequent risk he represented.
If you accept that Petraeus’s knowledge of, but non-involvement in, “Operation Zero Footprint” represented a potential risk to Hillary and Obama; you’d have to admit that Mike Morrel was by far the more White House friendly person talking about the CIA involvement around the joint State Dept/CIA Benghazi objectives.
Also, it would be disingenuous to ignore the fact Morrel’s loyalty therein was rewarded financially.
Lastly, one of the more slippery people to pin down on the Benghazi attack, and subsequent issues, has been Leon Panetta. If you think about Panetta’s role in the origin of Operation Zero Footprint his comment avoidance makes perfect sense.
Trey Gowdy needs to subpoena Panetta for the Special Committee.
OK, sorry that was more than a moment – but was needed.
Now back to Libya 2011/2012 and the Rift Between State/CIA and DoD/Pentagon over the arming of the “Rebels”. THIS IS REALLY QUITE IMPORTANT because it explains how far out Hillary Clinton had put herself in this covert op “Zero Footprint”.
A few reminder articles will outline and refresh why the White House kept DoD and The Pentagon at arms length throughout their covert operation:
[…] defense leaders in Washington [March 2011] slammed the brakes on the extent of US help to the rebels. Top officials said that some country other than the US should perform any future training and equipping of the Libyan opposition groups. Under withering congressional probing and criticism of what was described as an ill-defined mission to aid a rebel force that officials know little about, Robert Gates, the US defense secretary, sketched out a largely limited role for the US military going forward.
Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told members of the House Armed Services panel that many other countries have the ability to train and support the rebels. “My view would be, if there is going to be that kind of assistance to the opposition, there are plenty of sources for it other than the United States,” said Gates. “Somebody else should do that.” Gates and Mullen told Congress that future US participation will be limited and will not involve an active role in airstrikes as time goes on.
From a New York Times article about the same hearing -AND- the discussion of the CIA involvement. Again, remember this is 2011 – you have Secretary Gates, Joint Chiefs Mullen, and CIA Director Panetta:
2011 […] Gates and Mullen were testifying before the House and Senate Armed Services Committees in the wake of revelations that small teams of CIA operatives are working in Libya. Gates declined to comment on the CIA activities in Libya. US officials have acknowledged that the CIA has sent small teams of operatives into Libya and helped rescue a crew member of a US fighter jet that crashed.
The CIA’s precise role in Libya is not clear. Intelligence experts said the CIA would have sent officials to make contact with the opposition and assess the strength and needs of the rebel forces in the event Barack Obama, the US president, decided to arm them.
In hindsight we are now fully aware that unknown to both Mullen and Gates -at the time they were speaking- was President Obama having authorized Operation Zero Footprint several weeks earlier, and Panetta carrying it out.
The State Dept (Hillary) and CIA (Panetta) were now in the execution mode of the covert op.
We now know against the March/April 2011 backdrop of growing information about al-Qaeda’s presence within the rebel units – there was a genuine difference of opinion on whether even getting involved was a good idea.
The Defense Department (Gates, Mullen) was saying no, the State Department (Clinton, Rice), was saying yes.
Remember too, this covert operation was going to require NATO Admiral James Stavridis to allow the weapons into Libya. So lets look at what he was quoted saying around the same timeframe as Mullen and Gates, *knowing Stavridis was one of the actual key figures to make the weapons delivery possible*:
2011 – […] Now, as the White House and NATO continue to debate the possible ramifications of arming the Libyan opposition, the Haqqani network-linked Afghan commander says Libyan al Qaeda affiliates seem to be more “enthusiastic” about the war against Gaddafi every day.
And from what the Afghan Taliban commander has seen, there appears to be more than “flickers” of al Qaeda’s presence in Libya, the description given by NATO commander Admiral James Stavridis.
There is Stavridis playing down the possibility of al-Qaeda ideology within the make-up of the Islamic Fighting Group – which is important because by the time this quote was attributed Stavridis was already part of the team coordinating the shipments.
Also, remember R2P? This March/April 2011 timeframe is when “Responsibility To Protect” came up as a justification for our engagement. Samantha Power, Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton all wanting to fully support “the rebels”.
Ultimately Obama/Jarrett (The White House) agreed with Hillary Inc (State Dept); hence “Zero Footprint” got the nod – well, let’s be really accurate: it “sort of” got the nod.
Think about it. President Obama authorized arming the Libyan rebels, but the covert nature of Zero Footprint actually reflects the political filter through which all Obama White House decisions are made. A White House team that always looks for an escape hatch in case any decision is ever publicly wrong.
If the rebels were al-Qaeda, the covert op lends plausible deniability.
Isn’t it strange how in 2014 hindsight you can clearly see exactly what we now know as the “Benghazi narrative”; the use of their exact escape hatch because they were al-Qaeda, and it did go horribly and publicly wrong.
It should be noted, and actually emphasized, that Operation Zero Footprint, at least in 2011, was not illegal. Indeed, all indicators are that President Obama followed his constitutional responsibility as he carried out his executive authority.
We know in late February 2011 President Obama signed a Presidential Finding Memo authorizing the State Department and CIA to engage in actions within Libya to identify a course of action.
We know in March 2011 when Hillary Clinton (State Dept) and Leon Panetta (CIA) constructed “Operation Zero Footprint” that President Obama approved the covert action and then informed the Gang of Eight of the weapons transfer operation.
Both of those known facts speak well to the Executive Office following a legally outlined process. This does not, however, dismiss the concern, which became the reality, that the action itself was terribly flawed and horridly imprudent.
During March, April and May 2011 there was enough intelligence information flowing to the White House informing them of exactly who would be the beneficiaries of U.S. Libyan involvement and specifically providing weapons. It did not take long to identify the Benghazi and Darnah “rebels” were actually affiliates of al-Qaeda.
While no-one reporting in 2011 was aware of Operation Zero Footprint, there were literally hundreds of media reports showcasing the ideology of the Libyan “rebel” uprising. Indeed there were numerous reports in mainstream media outlets of al-Qaeda fighters (numerous factions) flowing to Libya to oust their life-long nemesis, Gaddaffi.
From a policy standpoint it will have to be left up to historians to pore over the facts and ultimately decide what was *this* White House goal in the entire region.
• Ben Ali removal -Tunisia- seemed OK to the administration, Obama and Clinton.
• Hosni Mubarak removal -Egypt- seemed even more ok to Obama and Clinton.
Both of the above were viewed as potential sources for favorable policy outcomes. Indeed the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt -and election of President Morsi- did not seem to be a concern for the White House.
However, when you get to Gaddaffi’s removal -Libya- you see a serious split between ideologies within the U.S. political class as Obama/Clinton actually pushed the outcome. The U.S. defense department saying they were apprehensive about this outcome, and Obama/Clinton going “all in” for Gaddaffi ouster with French President Sarkozy.
The same interventionist Obama/Clinton motivation was evident with Syria’s Assad as yet another uprising surfaced in yet another Mid-East nation – again in March/April 2011.
We know on October 20th 2011 Libyan Leader Muammar Gaddaffi was finally captured, then killed by “the rebels”.
From the standpoint of “regime change” operation Zero Footprint was a success.
The Libyan Transitional National Council was now in control. Well, maybe in charge, or, well, sort of.
The TNC may have been the face of Libya the Obama/Clinton team wanted to portray. But they were merely just that, a face.
We know Eastern Libya was then (2011), and is now (2014), a hotbed of radical Islam controlled by the Libyan Islamic Fighting Groups, the very people who benefitted from the arms that were part of Zero Footprint.
We know by the Fall/Winter of 2011 the U.S. State Dept and CIA were joined and trying to re-secure the same weapons they provided in the Spring/Summer.
December 2011 – New York Times:
“Assistant Secretary of State Andrew J. Shapiro raised the American desire to arrange a purchase program in a meeting this month with Libya’s new defense minister, according to American officials familiar with the proposal.
The United States has committed $40 million to secure Libya’s arms stockpiles, much of it to prevent the spread of Manpads. No budget has been designed for a purchase program, and the price to be paid for each missile and its components has not been determined, the official said.
We know from a speech delivered by Asst. Secretary of State Shapiro in Feb of 2012 the actual program to recapture the Zero Footprint weapons began in August of 2011 about two months before Gaddaffi was killed:
“Once the stalemate broke and the fighting rapidly shifted in the TNC’s [Libyan Transitional National Council] favor in August, we immediately deployed a State Department expert from the MANPADS Task Force to Benghazi.
Mark Adams, who you will hear from shortly on the panel, is the head of our MANPADS Task Force and spent considerable time on the ground in Libya.
[… ] The initial primary objective was to reach an agreement with the TNC to set up a MANPADS control and destruction program that would enable us to set up what we call our Phase I efforts.
Phase I entailed an effort to rapidly survey, secure, and disable loose MANPADS across the country. To accomplish this, we immediately deployed our Quick Reaction Force, which are teams made up of civilian technical specialists.”
We know those “civilian technical specialists”, being talked about in August 2011, were contractors, CIA contractors, hired by the State Department to recapture the weapons – some of which they provided as a specific consequence of Operation Zero Footprint.
If the story ended there it would be bad enough. A flawed policy, a secret mission arm the Libyan “rebels” without a great deal of thinking through the longer term consequences. A flawed policy with political consequences.
But when you think about the larger picture you understand why the details of the covert weapons operation Zero Footprint were so tightly guarded among select members of Congress (the Gang of Eight), the CIA (Panetta), the State Department (Clinton) and the White House (Donilon).
Each of them was trying to manage a covert operation that would expose a U.S. policy decision to arm al-Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist militias.
But that’s only “IF” the story ended there, in Libya, at the end of 2011 into the beginning of 2012. It didn’t, the decisions got worse – much worse.
The uprising in Syria was only a few months behind the uprising in Libya. Arguably if the timing were reversed you could ponder that Assad would have met Gaddaffi’s fate, and Gaddaffi would be as alive today as President Assad.
Whichever rebel group got the attention of the R2P crowd was sure to be the first to get assistance. The Obama R2P Doctrine is so tenuous, and so lacking in political principle, it’s subject to change based on the political whims of capitol hill at any given moment.
The Libyan “rebels” got all the weaponry love – the Syrian “rebels”, not-so-much.
Enter Hillary Clinton. As she reiterated vehemently to Greta Van Sustern during a recent interview, it was Hillary who wanted to help the Syrian rebels when no-one else wanted to assist them. Secretary Hillary Clinton wanted early and direct interventionist action in Syria to topple Assad just like Gaddaffi.
Obviously consequences from the first covert weapons mission in Libya made a stark case for not repeating it in Syria. Another huge factor against helping the FSA was Israel. Ultimately Israel could not afford to be put into such a risky position if Syrian rebel forces were given arms that ultimately might be used against them.
There’s no way congress, in an election year, would approve of funding Syrian rebels against the possibility of it hurting Israel; And the White House was not about to do aknown and official covert operation which had a great potential to go sideways, and become far too politically dangerous. 2012 was an election year.
Unless of course, you’re a Clinton.
Who wanted to aid Syria more? President Obama or Hillary Clinton? That is a question for later year historians. Regardless of how the idea came up, we know a decision was made to do it, and to do it covertly and illegally.
Arming the Benghazi Darnah rebels was, well, stupid. It was actually stupid, and politically stupid, but it was not illegal.
Arming jihadist fighters in Syria without congressional approval, and without official covert notification laws being followed, *WAS* illegal.
Everything Iran-Contra was -and was not- can be rolled up with a big exclamation point.
We know the basic set up to arm the Syrian rebellion was generally not too complex.
Turkey would be used as an intermediary, and the U.S. had Sunni friends in Saudi Arabia -who were more than willing to see Assad removed- and financially assist in arming the Syrians without too great a concern for what could happen to Israel.
For Obama/Clinton to get weapons to the Syrians, without going through congress, would involve buying back the weapons already floating around from Operation Zero Footprint and redirecting them to Syria through Turkey.
The Saudis would be a willing financier if the State Dept needed additional money to facilitate the transfers.
We know Ambassador Chris Stevens set up a formal U.S. Embassy consulate in Tripoli around May 26th of 2012. And we know the State Dept and CIA set up their joint operations in Benghazi around the same time.
The official U.S. State Dept presence was vacated on Feb 25th of 2011 when the embassy personell were evacuated. Stevens was re-establishing the diplomatic office and acting as Ambassador to Libya during the 2012 reconstruction phase.
What we did not know at the time was that Chris Stevens was also acting as the facilitator for U.S. arms shipments OUT OF LIBYA, through Turkish diplomatic couriers and into Syria.
A very strong argument can easily be made that Chris Stevens was a CIA operative inside the State Department. Many people within the State Department are CIA personnel using the State Dept as part of their visible cover.
In Eastern Libya June, July, August 2012 – Obviously the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, Ansar Al Sharia, aka 17th Feb Brigade, and all of their commanders knew of the U.S. Benghazi weapons programs. Both the 2011 distribution, and the 2012 repurchase.
Considering the redeployment to Syria – for the most part the Benghazi and Darnah brigades would have been in alignment with their Jihadist brethren in Syria being the beneficiaries of the shipments.
But there was in 2011/2012 – an ideological rift between the newly emboldened Muslim Brotherhood and the ‘more initially moderate’ Free Syrian Army (FSA). As the Libyan conflict rolled on through the summer of 2011 more al-Qaeda elements flocked from other engagements into the Syrian fight. Moderates were replaced by extremists.
By the time Hillary and Chris Stevens were working on support for Syria, Summer 2012, the radical Syrian opposition was embedded inside the FSA. Arguably they were the majority element. The Syrian opposition had three al-Qaida arms operating within it. Including one that also operated in Libya:
- Jund al-Sham, which is made up of al-Qaida militants who are Syrian, Palestinian and Lebanese;
- Jund al-Islam, which in recent years merged with Ansar al-Islam, an extremist group of Sunni Iraqis operating under the al-Qaida banner and operating in Yemen and Libya;
- Jund Ansar al-Allah, an al-Qaida group based in Gaza linked to Palestinian camps in Lebanon and Syria.
It would be into this eclectic mix of Jihadist ideologues that any diverted U.S. arms would flow. It’s no wonder that Senator John McCain was so confused when he was calling them “moderates” in 2012/2013. Almost no-one knew the severe elements in Syria would rise to the surface and become the modern ISIS now capturing all of the global attention.
And…. If you just realized…. Yes, ISIS or ISIL currently on the march in Iraq, came from Syria, fought in Syria and more than likely was armed by the U.S. inside Syria; and trained by the same CIA operatives used by the State Dept to send Syria weapons from Benghazi and Darnah back in Libya.
If Operation Zero Footprint in Libya was stupid, arming the Syrian branches of al-Qaeda two years after the FSA was thoroughly corrupted by al-Qaeda, is infinite degrees beyond stupid.
But that’s hindsight for ya… or as Secretary Clinton would say “Whether they were, … at this point, what difference does it make?“
By June of 2012 the New York Times was reporting that the CIA is operating a secret arms transfer program to Syria that sounded exactly like the re-diversion plan Clinton developed with Panetta/Petraeus. According to the Times suddenly, there is: “…an influx of weapons and ammunition to the rebels.”
We know on September 5th 2012 – A Libyan flagged ship called Al Entisar (“The Victory”) docks in the Turkish port of Iskenderun. It is carrying 400 tons of cargo including many weapons such as rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) and shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles (MANPADS) destined for Syrian rebels 35 miles away from Iskenderun.
The ship’s captain told the Times of London that the Muslim Brotherhood and the Free Syrian Army broke into a fight over the arms.
More to come…
The key to the theory is that U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was killed in the attacks, was facilitating U.S. arms shipments from Libyans the Obama administration had previously armed to Syrian rebels–rebels who would morph into ISIS, or the Islamic State, the brutal terrorists currently murdering Iraqi Christians and other minorities.
Because of the covert–and very possibly illegal–nature of the operation, the Benghazi investigations were discouraged by every Democrat the president could rely on to do so.
To the degree that there is any truth to these claims–and they certainly appear to be thoroughly researched–President Barack Obama, then-Secretary Hillary Clinton, and possibly a large number of others in the Obama administration may very well be guilty of conducting covert operations illegally-that is, without notifying Congress as required.
The truth usually comes out in the end, however, and Congressman Trey Gowdy is both determined and well-qualified to see that happen in this case–no matter what obstacles the Democrats put in his path.
FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF MY BENGHAZI POSTS:
- Gowdy Calling Off Benghazi Investigation After Receiving Death Threats?
- Democrat Slanders Murdered Ambassador in Front of Trey Gowdy
- Trey Gowdy Uncovered Something The State Department Wishes He Didn’t
- Trey Gowdy Will Subpoena Hillary Clinton Over Benghazi
- "130 MARINE FORCE RECON – 2 Hours Away the Night of Benghazi"
- TREY GOWDY NOT PLAYING GAMES IN FIRST BENGHAZI HEARING!
- 75 Questions Trey Gowdy Could Use to Single-Handedly Take Down Hillary
- Transparently Bad: U.S. Whistleblowers Feel Blowback
- Gowdy To Ungag Benghazi Witnesses
- Clinton State Dept. Official Reveals DETAILS of Alleged Document Review
- Whistleblower: Hillary Allies Hid Documents That Would Make Her Look Bad
- Expert Just Confirmed That Trey Gowdy Will Put Hillary Through Hell
- House Benghazi Panel To Hold First Hearing Next Week
- Obama is Using “Orchestrated Strategy” to Censor Benghazi
- Gowdy: Benghazi WILL NOT be Swept Under the Rug!
- Liberal Networks Skip Bombshell Benghazi Claim
- Gowdy Hires Retired Army 3-Star For Benghazi Probe
- Trey Gowdy: I’m Going to “Methodically” Take Down Obama
- Benghazi Whistleblowers Reveal Being TOLD TO STAND DOWN 3 Times
- Top CIA Officer in Benghazi Delayed Response to Terrorist Attack
- SECURITY: DELAYS IN BENGHAZI COST AMBASSADOR STEVENS LIFE
- Trey is Going to Need Military or Law Enforcement Loyal to RULE OF LAW!
- Barack H. Obama WENT TO BED While Benghazi Battle Raged!
- BOMBSHELL: Allen West Comes Forward With Truth About Benghazi
- Newest Addition to Trey Gowdy’s Benghazi Team Should Have Obama Scared
- Report: THIS is Why Hillary Clinton is Afraid of Trey Gowdy
- Trey Gowdy: I’m Going to “Methodically” Take Down Obama
- Hillary Supplied Stinger Missiles that Taliban Used to Attack US Chopper
- Why is Trey Gowdy Getting Death Threats?
- INSANITY!!!!! – House Democrats Weigh Role in New Benghazi Probe
- Obama Takes ‘Offense’ at Benghazi Claims
- John Kerry Says He Will Not Comply With House Subpoena – ARREST HIM!
- Why Did MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD Have Secret Email LONG AGO?????
- Issa: Obama’s Benghazi Attack Spin ‘Disturbing, Criminal, Nixonian’
- Benghazi Development Could Bring Down Obama & Clinton
- SAME QUESTION: Where Was Obama During the Attack?
- Why Benghazi Should Matter to EVERY AMERICA! (VIDEO)
- Trey Gowdy PISSED He Did Not Get That Email In Congress!
- Ex Military and CIA Committee: Obama and Hillary Did It
- White House & Al Qaeda Arms Deal That Facilitated Benghazi Attack
- [VIDEO]: Hillary Clinton Implicated In Benghazi Murders
- NEW EVIDENCE! Benghazi Was a Planned Tragedy
- Poll: Huge Majority of Americans Want Benghazi Investigated
- Obama Administration Withholds Key Benghazi Emails
- Republicans Launch New Benghazi Investigation Website
- CIA Director Edited Talking Points For Obama’s Re-Election Campaign
- Obama THREATENS Fox News Reporter For Digging Too Deep On Benghazi
- Aiding the FBI’s Benghazi Investigation Is a Deadly Job
- Was Obama High On Cocaine the Night of Benghazi?
- Deaths Connected to the Clinton Machine
- Deaths Connected to Team Obama
- Video Will Show How the Obama Presidency Lied in 3 Minutes Flat
- Allen West’s 6 Disturbing Unanswered Questions Regarding Benghazi
- Rep. Trey Gowdy’s Epic Takedown of the Times’ Benghazi Report…
- CLOSED-DOOR TESTIMONY ‘BOLSTERS CLAIMS’ OF BENGHAZI STAND DOWN ORDERS, INADEQUATE RESPONSE
TREY GOWDY'S GREATEST HITS:
- Refuting Gowdy’s Objections to Obama’s Impeachment
- TREY NOT PLAYING GAMES WITH FIRST BENGHAZI HEARING!
- 75 QUESTIONS TREY COULD USE TO TAKE DOWN HILLARY
- Trey is Going to Need Military or Law Enforcement Loyal to RULE OF LAW!
- Report: THIS is Why Hillary Clinton is Afraid of Trey Gowdy
- 11 Most Badass Things Trey Gowdy Has Ever Said
- Trey Gowdy: I’m Going to “Methodically” Take Down Obama
- What Happens When You Don't Answer Trey's Questions!
- Trey Gowdy: I Don’t Care Whose Career is Ruined, It’s Justice Time [WATCH]
- Gowdy OBLITERATES IRS Commissioner
- Trey Gowdy And The Former IRS Head You’ve Been Waiting For…
- Rep: Gowdy: Dems Have ‘Selective Amnesia’ About Tragedy Fundraising
- Trey Gowdy: IRS Scandal Leads Directly to White House [VIDEO]
- Trey Gowdy Sought as Chief Counsel to Prosecute Corrupt Politicians
- Trey Doubles Down: Pelosi Needs a Mental Health Professional
- Trey Gowdy EXPLODES on Obama in Stirring Floor Speech
- Trey Gowdy: The House Should Defund Obama’s Vacations
- What Trey Gowdy Said Had People Cheering Him to be POTUS!
- Watch Trey Gowdy Smoke ObamaCare Like a Cheap Cigar in Just 3 Minutes
- Trey Gowdy Wants YOU to Know WHY Obama Keeps Brushing Off Benghazi
- Trey Gowdy GOES OFF On Obama’s ‘Not a Smidgen of Corruption’ Claim
- Rep. Trey Gowdy’s Epic Takedown of the Times’ Benghazi Report…
- Trey: Obama’s Disregard of Law ‘Has Reached an Unprecedented Level’
- Gowdy’s Explosive Question Vaporize This Stammering Witness
- Rep.Trey Gowdy ROYALLY Rips Liberal Media Over Benghazi
- Obama Administration “Creating Aliases” To Hide Benghazi Survivors
- If President Obama ‘Didn’t Know,’ then Who’s Running the Government? – ASK REP. TREY GOWDY!
ALSO NOTICE THE SHARE BUTTONS AT THE BOTTOM AND TWEET BUTTON AT THE TOP OF THE ARTICLE TO GET THIS OUT TO OTHER AMERICANS.